Support
The fusion of powers (executive and legislative) ensures stability and responsiveness, but Kashyap warns that it also opens the door for the executive to dominate Parliament if the ruling party has a brute majority.
One of Kashyap’s central arguments is that the Indian Constitution is not merely a lawyer’s document or a political charter; it is a . He emphasizes that the Constituent Assembly did not just draft a framework for governance, but a blueprint for social transformation.
His village was facing a crisis: a proposed highway was set to cut through their ancestral grazing lands, and the local council seemed to have signed the papers behind closed doors. The villagers felt helpless, viewing the government as a "paradise for lawyers" rather than a shield for the poor. Inspired by Kashyap’s focus on citizen-friendly foundations rule of law
🇮🇳
